A Canadian temporary or permanent resident visa may be refused for several reasons:
In some cases, and for some programs, the requirements are clearly defined, while in others they are more generally outlined, allowing more discretion for the officer to assess and decide.
For example, a study permit applicant must provide evidence that they have a certain amount of funds available for the first year of studies in Canada. The absence of this evidence is a clear ground for refusal. If, however, they included a bank statement but were still refused for not providing proof, this constitutes a mistaken disregard of the evidence. This contrasts with another case where the statement shows the required funds and was considered by the officer, but the application was refused due to other factors, which may or may not be unreasonable.
How to address a visa refusal will be determined by the type of Canadian visa, the grounds for refusal, and the information and supporting documents submitted with the application. There are four options to address a refusal:
Canadian immigration legislation and case law are quite complex for non-lawyers; therefore, it is recommended to seek help from a professional to devise an action plan.
Call us at +1-416-915-0808 or email us at info@leromlaw.com for additional information you need to begin the process.
Canadian visas are often refused if applicants fail to meet the set program requirements according to immigration legislation, or due to errors or unreasonable assessments made by the assessing officers. In some instances, the requirements are explicitly defined, but in others, they are more generally stated, giving officers more discretionary power in decision-making.
Individuals facing visa refusals have multiple avenues to consider, including requesting reconsideration, reapplying with additional or corrected documentation, seeking a judicial review if the decision seems unfairly unreasonable, or filing an appeal when eligible.
To pursue reconsideration, an applicant should promptly submit a detailed explanation of any oversight or misinterpretation by the immigration officer to the processing center or visa office, including all supporting documents initially provided with the original application.
Reapplication is advisable when an individual can thoroughly address the concerns listed in the original refusal letter. This includes providing any missing information or documentation from the initial application and supplying additional arguments to clarify and resolve any misunderstandings.
If a visa refusal seems disproportionately unfair or unreasonable against the backdrop of an applicant’s eligibility and supporting documentation, applying for a judicial review could be a viable option. This must be filed with the Federal Court of Canada within specific deadlines, depending on whether the matter arose within or outside Canada. The process aims not to replace the decision but to evaluate its reasonableness and, if found wanting, to request a new assessment by a different officer.